ACD 401.1A, Updating Weapon Quality Policy and Process Requirements Definition for Conditional Products and Their Use in Weapons and Weapon-Related Assemblies
Define and establish the use of Conditional Products and NNSA Conditionally Accepted Products until revisions can be incorporated into NNSA Policy (NAP) 40 I. IA, NNSA Weapon Quality Policy.
Version history and related documents
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
National Nuclear Security Administration Advance Change Directive
I NNSA ACD 401.lA I
Approved: 01-31-24
Expiration: 01-31-25
SUBJECT: UPDATING WEAPON QUALITY POLICY AND PROCESS
REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION FOR CONDITIONAL PRODUCTS AND
THEIR USE IN WEAPONS AND WEAPON-RELATED ASSEMBLIES.
PURPOSE: Define and establish the use of Conditional Products and NNSA Conditionally
Accepted Products until revisions can be incorporated into NNSA Policy (NAP) 40 I. IA, NNSA
Weapon Quality Policy.
URGENCY: This Advance Change Directive (ACD) expands on exiting policies related to the
use of non-conforming product that meets the communicated design allowance but are lacking a
Specification Exception Release (SXR) to be considered fully acceptable. Products of this
pedigree are required to be held while exception documents are researched, written, and approved.
The allowances contained herein will ensure compliance to the requirements of NAP 401. IA and
provide for continued flow of assessed risk Conditional Products through the Production Agency
(PA) facilities. If events were to occur without this ACD in place, production at PA facilities
would likely stop for an unknown duration as specification exceptions are written and released.
APPLICABILITY: This ACD applies to all Federal NNSA elements, 1 including NNSA Nuclear
Security Enterprise (NSE) Management and Operating Contractor (M&O) sites, M&O employees,
and Federal Field/Production Office (F/PO) employees at each site which use NAP 401. IA policy
in the design, manufacturing, and acceptance of Weapon Products. The changes stated herein take
effect upon release and take precedent over the latest released version of NAP 401.IA and
embedded NAP 401.1, Attachment 3: Weapon Quality Process Requirements.
BACKGROUND: Recent unrelated issues at PA sites have resulted in significant quantities of
product held for release of Engineering Authorizations, specifically SXRs, providing authority to
consider non-conforming product, conforming, or Mark Quality. While assessments by the
Design Agency (DA) were deemed low to nil risk, the logistics of performing validation of the
initial assessment and releasing required SXRs took considerable time and resources, leading to
part shortages at the next assembly PA. In fact, inventory available at the next assembly PA was
also placed in a hold status until the needed SXRs were released, further paralyzing the supply
chain. As a result, scheduled deliveries of weapon product shipments to the Ultimate User were
put at risk.
The stated changes in this ACD have been developed at the request of the Federal Program Offices
and Federal leadership at the PA facilities as a solution to resulting delays in the supply chain where
product is held awaiting release of specification exceptions and the responsible DA engineer has
determined the risk to be acceptable. The intent is to provide direction for the F/PO to follow as they
encounter delays in production and would otherwise wait for the SXRs before the production process
with the non-conforming product could resume.
By allowing the leverage of already-existing control systems in the Manufacturing Execution
1 In accordance with the responsibilities and authorities assigned by Executive Order 12344, codified at 50 U.S.
Code sections 2406 and 2511, and to ensure consistency throughout the joint Navy/DOE Naval Nuclear Propulsion
Program, the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors (Director) will implement and oversee requirements and
practices pertaining to this Directive for activities under the Director's cognizance, as deemed appropriate.
Section 2
Systems (MES) at the respective sites, product can proceed to predetermined point in the process
with administrative holds placed in the MES system, thus preventing the shipment of material to
the next PA or the Ultimate User. With the release of this ACD, the definition of Conditional
Product and NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product are created. This new terminology enables
product historically considered "non-conforming" now to be considered "Conditional" when
there is a verifiable, written statement from a design authority that has the requisite technical
authority to determine that there is a high degree of probability that the needed SXR will likely
be released.
REQUIREMENTS: All requirements with specified changes to NAP 401.l A and NAP 401.1,
Attachment 3 listed below must be followed:
1. Language added to NAP 401.lA, page 5, section 8, Definitions, to include "Conditional
Product" and "NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product."
Conditional Product. Product that is lacking a Specification Exception Release (SXR)
needed to be otherwise considered Mark Quality; however, there is documented evidence
the needed SXR will likely be released by the Design Agency (DA), there is no impact to
safety, and there is an urgent need for the product. Conditional Product is a subset of
nonconforming product and is allowed to proceed with production activities until a
control point is reached. Conditional Product also includes products with requirements
for a Qualification Evaluation Release (QER), but currently have a Conditional
Qualification Evaluation Release (CQER) released. The Federal Program Manager
(FPM), or appropriate acceptor of risk, must review the relevant supporting
documentation and authorize the product to be identified as Conditional Product. If the
needed SXR is not obtainable or applicable to entire lots, all product not covered by the
SXR will be returned to non-conforming status, and assemblies that consumed
Conditional Product not covered by the SXR will be considered non-conforming.
NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product. Conditional Product that has successfully
completed NNSA Verification Inspection that otherwise lacks only a SXR to support full
acceptance and has documented evidence that needed SXR will likely be released by the
DA. NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product also includes products with requirements
for a QER, but currently have a CQER released, once verification inspection is complete
against CQER requirements. The FPM determines if categorizing product as Conditional
Product or NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product is in the best interest of the NNSA and
must be approved by the Director WQD. If the needed SXR is not obtainable or
applicable to entire lots, all product not covered by the SXR will be returned to non
conforming status, and assemblies that consumed NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product
not covered by the SXR will be considered non-conforming.
2. Language added to NAP 401.lA, Attachment 2, page AT2-27, section 6.6.12,
Conditional Product:
Conditional Product must be controlled by the PA using F/PO-approved control systems
(e.g., KCNSC- QIR or NPO-IQR). The control method and number will be listed on
any applicable Certificate oflnspection (COI) when submitted for NNSA Conditional
Product Acceptance.
3. Language added to NAP 401.lA, Attachment 2, page AT2-29, section 7.4, NNSA
Conditionally Accepted Product:
Section 3
a. NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product may be stamped with Acceptance Stamps
provided it will be controlled using F/PO approved control systems (e.g., KCNSC
- QIR or NPO - IQR.) The control method and number should be listed on any
applicable COL Movement of NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product from PA
to PA is accomplished using the Circle-T process.
b. NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product cannot ship to the Ultimate User prior to
resolution of stated condition(s) and therefore become NNSA Accepted Product.
c. All elements ofNNSA Accepted Products, as stated in Para 7.2, apply to NNSA
Conditionally Accepted Product.
4. Language changed in NAP 401.1 , Attachment 3, page A3-17, section 3.1.4.e, Verification
Inspections Submittals to :
"(i) The COI is the official document used
1) by Contractors to identify and certify product that the submitted material meets
design requirements or is Conditional Product;"
5. Language changed in NAP 401.1, Attachment 3, page A3-l 7, section 3.1.4.e.,
Verification Inspection Submittals to:
"ii. Contractors:
3) Certify on a COI that the listed material meets the applicable specification and
quality requirements of the contract or meets the definition of Conditional Product
(see Appendix 3.1-D)."
6. Language added to NAP 401.1, Attachment 3, page A3-19, Section 3.1.4.h., Verification
Inspection Criteria,
"i. Determine acceptability of submitted product based upon the following criteria:
4) When performing Verification Inspection on Conditional Product, supporting
Conditional Product documentation is applicable to product presented for
Verification Inspection. All the above requirements except 3) for stated
conditions, requiring verifiable documentation of SXR intent from a responsible
technical design authority, are performed with consideration of stated conditions."
7. Language changed in NAP 401.1, Attachment 3, page A3-29, Appendix 3.1-D,
Instructions for Certificate of Inspection:
4. Product Definition, change "Record information to identify the DA Product Design
Definition, by issue or controlled summary documents (i.e., Addendum Index), which
defines the material, including engineering authorizations (i.e., Specification Exception
Release (SXR), Special Instructions Engineering Release (SIER), Advance Change Order
(ACO)). If material has been reprocessed and reaccepted to specific DA requirements,
identify the applicable reprocessing definition. Record the Quality Evaluation Report
(QER) on First Production Units (FPUs) and continue to list all conditional QERs until
the product is acceptable. Identify the subcontractor when the material has been
purchased. List control number and/or Circle-T Plan date/revision for Conditional
Product. Once conditions are met, the COI will be re-opened to include any released
documents related to the Conditional Product status and state that all conditions have
been met. Summary logs will be revised to indicate full Acceptance.
8. Language changed in NAP 401.1 , Attachment 3, page A3-44, Table 1: NNSA Stamps to :
Diamond- "Diamond Stamp indicates material is Mark Quality, NNSA Accepted
Product, or NNSA Conditionally Accepted Product."
Circle T - "(2) It is applied to both material and packages being shipped to another
NNSA site. The Circle T stamp is applied to product according to the class stated in the
approved Circle T Plan. The Circle-T Plan is approved by the Director, NNSA Weapon
Quality Division.
For questions or comments on the ACD please contact the NNSA HQ Weapons Quality Division
(NA-121.3) at WOA@nnsa.doe.gov.
BY ORDER OF THE ADMINISTRATOR:
Jill Hruby
Administrator